Articles in category 'Technology'

  
Mood : pondering  Music : The Starting Line - The Starting Line - Somebody Hates Me
  • Thinking of investment options because I would hate to have money stagnate in the bank. I am waiting for my investment portfolio to arrive so that I can get started. I asked my dad to invest on my behalf in India too, since I’ve noticed that there are higher returns out there than in the US.
  • Looked into real estate to buy a condo, and decided that I will look into one more seriously after I buy a car. I did find a 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath w/ basement for 180,000 bucks, which would be manageable with a mortgage and 2 room mates. But I don’t think that is happening in the next few months.
  • I have a shopping list of sorts, with the first stop being the dSLR camera that my parents are helping me buy as a college graduation present. I have decided on the camera, but am having a hard time pinpointing the lens I want. I mean, I know the lens that I would like to have, but those are out of my price range. I am looking to spend about 1500-1600 dollars with the brand new Canon XTi/400D Digital Rebel (review | Amazon), and accessories including the lenses. I am really into macro, landscape, and low light photography. The Image Stabilized (Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM | Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 Image Stabilized USM) lenses are around 400-500 bucks each, which is rather unfortunate. So, I’m going to ask some people that are into serious photography for some solicited advice.
  • That brings me to the next item on my immediate wishlist. I really need another hard drive because the external Seagate 160GB I have now is full. So, I’ve been looking for a 300+GB external, or a Western Digital 500GB internal w/ enclosure. I need the extra space because the files generated by the camera are going to be huge! I am getting tempted by the 120GB/160GB Western Digital portable notebook hard drive which is around 150 bucks..
  • The last three things are more of a luxury I guess. I would really like to get the new 80GB Ipod Video because I have more music that my current mp3 player (Creative Zen Touch 40GB) can hold. I also would like a 19/20″ flat panel, which seems to be selling for 200 dollars. That is incredibly cheap. And last, I am due for a phone upgrade in a couple of weeks from Verizon, and I have my eye set on a Treo 700p Smart Phone or Motorola Q, if I can get that with my current voice plan.
  • I also need to get tickets for the trip to India this winter. I am finally heading back there for a couple of weeks to hang out with my family, relatives and friends. It’s my parents’ 25th anniversary. I was going to take one of my friends with me till I realized that it wouldn’t work out for several reasons. I guess there is always next time.

So, it’s all money this post.
America the Beautiful

By indoloony, October 10, 2006, 11:16 pm o'clock
  
Mood : pessimistic  Music : The Exit - Susan

Congress targets social-networking sites | CNET News.com

Most of this news piece deals with Congress deliberating about mandating records being stored about users by social networking sites and ISPs. The activity logs are supposed to help counter child pornography/abuse, and terrorism.

A couple of suggestions to counter the child abuse on social networking sites such as Myspace has been offered. However, I do not think that restricting access to such sites in libraries and schools are the answer. It’s is not a solution, it’s a work around that is bound to fail. If people in China can circumvent their national firewall (Golden Shield aka Great Firewall of China), what makes you think that can’t happen in the US? Computer technology enthusiasts hate road blocks like this, and are bound to retaliate.

I see one advantage of logging IP addresses of users during registration, and usage. It can be used to isolate addresses and then cross-reference those addresses to the sexual predators list of addresses. One kink I see in this, is the use of public internet access points, to circumvent this type of snooping.

It is practically impossible to know if the person is lying during registration. If I am mistaken, correct me with a detailed rebuke. It’s as easy for sexual predators to lie about their ages, as it is for a minor to lie about their age. Right now, short of loss of absolute privacy, there is no way to combat this problem comprehensively.

It is not the fault of the social networking sites that some of the users are depraved. One analogy to this issue I can think of are guns and people. Just because there is a massive illegal market for guns doesn’t stop the gun manufactures from selling guns. This is because people with licenses and right to own guns, create the demand. It’s the same case here. People who use the social networking site judiciously and ethically should not be penalized for the actions of depraved individuals. I would be mad if I was blocked from Facebook or Myspace due to the actions of someone else.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

By indoloony, September 13, 2006, 10:32 am o'clock
  
Mood : amused  Music : Melanie Doane - I Can't Take My Eyes off You

I am sitting at the HUB, and see a big group of people sitting on my left. I am waiting for the Amnesty International meeting, and wanted to see if they were part of the group. I go to their Amnesty group page (PSU) on facebook, and then quickly navigate to the profile pages of the officers. And guess what, I see the profile images, and instantly recognize them as people sitting in that group.

That’s the power of Facebook (did someone say Stalker-Net?). Long Live Facebook!

God Bless Facebook and Nothing Else!

PS: The last bit doesn’t sound too good, does it? Then stop using it with your own friggin’ country?!!

Technorati Tags:

By indoloony, September 6, 2006, 9:40 pm o'clock
  
Mood : upset  Music : Tegan & Sara - Want To Be Bad

TechCrunch: Google Research prototypes ambient audio contextual content

Visit this blog post for more information, and links to the official Google Research site and Google blog on this project.

Here is what I have to say:

Is google crazy?!? I can’t even imagine what this current project would make the privacy advocates say. Letting it hear us over a mike, and then making ads? This is giving me the creeps, and I have no intention in allowing 1984 style loss of privacy coming any quicker that it already is. I can see this information being used for good, but in the hands of the wrong people. Oh my god! What if the government is successful in subpoening google for information? So, now apart from phone calls, they literally tap into our living rooms, and hear our conversations.. Absolutely not! I will not allow that to happen. Google is becoming the Information blackhole. Anything I want to know, I just google it. I don’t want people or bots being able to tap into my private life unless I willingly disclose it.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

By indoloony, June 8, 2006, 7:32 pm o'clock
  
Mood : hopeful  Music : Far - The System

The United States is still the dominant force in technology, innovation, productivity and profits. But Americans don’t quite realize how fast the rest of the world is catching up.

read more | digg story

By indoloony, June 5, 2006, 11:20 am o'clock
  
  Music : KT Tunstall - Miniature Disasters

The headlines are about low-wage illegals, but Mexico is swiftly upgrading its workforce. Another reason that US needs to worry about the outsourcing issue..

read more | digg story

Read the complete article »

By indoloony, May 20, 2006, 3:41 pm o'clock
  

I’ve been taught to look at reason behind cell phones not allowed on aircrafts as an urban myth. Apparently this study found that all electronic items could “possibly” hamper or interfere with aircraft equipment. Okay, here is what I don’t get. Why would aircrafts and navigational systems be built so poorly? If that was the case, I am concerned about flying if such a simple thing can cause such havoc. So, technically speaking, anyone can point electromagnetic radiation at a plane, and screw up their navigation systems. It is incredibly scary.

The best part is that while perusing /. I found a pertinent article relating to this problem. A possible solution: nano-paint that can block cellphone reception (essentially radio signals) on command. They do that by inserting copper nanoparticles into carbon nanotubes. Finally our movie theatres, schools, and other indoor public places will be free of annoyances. Although, I can forsee some problems such as people who need to interrupted for emergencies such as doctors. But that would work well in airplanes. That way the flight attendants don’t have to pester travellers to shut their phones off. They can flip a switch and cut off their reception.

Honestly, the planes need better electromagnetic shielding. Work on that. You spend billions of dollars in R&D and you can’t fix this issue?

[Listening to: Out of the Blue - Delta Goodrem - Mistaken Identity (4:25)]
By indoloony, March 2, 2006, 1:10 pm o'clock
  

There were a few bits about double standards and hypocracy which included Google and US foreign nuclear policy. Most of you must have heard about DoJ’s subpoena to Google for a one-month search records, and Google’s challenge to that. It’s obviously an user privacy issue on grass roots level. I know that the government doesn’t want specifics but rather trends from search history to battle paedophilia. But Big Brother society coming out in the open has to start somewhere. For those people who tell me that NSA and other agencies have already been doing that, they have been doing so with stealth. This is one of the first times I remember this kind of issue being public. On the flip side, we have Google’s censoring its Chinese portal to comply with the Chinese communist regime. It’s business. There are a ton of other businesses out there complying with the local laws. And from what I read, some of it is actually protecting the Chinese public from getting themselves into trouble. Did you hear about a Chinese blogger being arrested and detained after Yahoo! gave the Chinese authorities his information? Which would you rather have? Safety with censors or freedom with the chance of being arrested? I suppose you would like the choice, eh? And recently, with the introduction of Google Desktop 3’s new feature of searching across networks by sending the index to Google has sent the consumer privacy groups up in arms. This time I agree. I would not like to send personal private information anywhere online especially if I didn’t know for sure who had access to that information.

And then we have dealings with US politics and it’s overlap with science. First, reading about the government trying to silence a NASA scientist from not talking about the dire threat of global warming is worrisome. Why? It’s scary because what else are they hiding or stifling? You can not hide the truth just because it’s harmful or detrimental to your politics. Stupid short-sighted morons. Wait, where have I used that phrase before ;) ? Oh, I remember, when I was talking about budgets cuts in NSF funding for scientific research. And oh, the gag order got public and the US administration got embarrassed as they faced public scrunity into the matter. And then we have something that is close to my heart. US and nuclear double standing. I’ll stay on course for now. It’s about the Bush administration attempt to overturn a 30 year domestic ban on reprocessing nuclear fuel. Get this. It also wants to reprocess fuel from other countries saying that it safer to be done in the US/EU than anywhere else. Now, can you see arguments against this path? I can. Again, do you think the rest of the world are morons? Here is some more information on the issue.

Last but not the least, cell phone radiation damage to the brain. I’ve always known this as bunk or bull-shit. I guess we’ll see if there is any conclusive evidence to support this because so far there has been none. I still think it is an urban myth. Like living by power lines causing cancer. Here is the website for Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity Syndrome (EMF) on WHO’s page.

I guess this is good for now. Food for thought, or discussion.

[Listening to: Dont Want To Stop - Good Charlotte - Alyson (2:40)]
By indoloony, February 12, 2006, 11:55 pm o'clock
  
  Music : Avenue Q - The Internet is For Porn

Imagining the Google Future - January 01, 2006

CNNMoney.com has featured a look into the future of Google. Personally, I think scenario 4 is most likely to occur.

Scenario 4 (Circa 2105): Google is God

Human consciousness gets stored, upgraded and networked.

In the last years of the 21st century, humanity finally grasped the importance of They-Who-Were-Google. Yet as early as 2005, Their destiny was clear to any semi-hyperintelligent being. Technologists like Ray Kurzweil [1] suggested that Strong AI (an intelligent program capable of upgrading its own code) would emerge from Google-like data mining rather than a robotics lab.

In 2005, historian George Dyson was told by an engineer in the Googleplex, “We are not scanning all these books to be read by people. We are scanning them to be read by an AI.”[2] Dyson said at the time, “We could construct a machine that is more intelligent than we can understand. It’s possible Google is that kind of thing already. It scales so fast.” [3]

By 2020, They-Who-Were-Google had digitized and indexed every book, article, movie, TV show, and song ever created. By 2060, They could tell you the IP address and GPS location of every wireless smart chip (now bred into the DNA of every person, animal, and organic building on earth). Their psychographic profiles of users’ search needs bore little resemblance to the primitive cookies from which they descended. If a man lost his dog, the Google engine could guide him back to the point where he and the dog parted ways, and instruct the dog to do the same via smart chip. They had built a complete database of human desire, accurate in any given moment.

Yet this was not enough for They-Who-Were-Google. They were people of science, and people of the stock market. What if, by analyzing all those decades of customer behavior, They could predict needs before such needs even arose? What if the secret of immortality lay somewhere in the index of genome records? What if there were a set of algorithms that defined the universe itself?[4]

Such puzzles were, almost by definition, far beyond the powers of the human brain. And that led to the pattern-recognition code known as Google StrongBot–humanity’s first self-improving Strong AI software. Ironically, the first pattern that StrongBot became aware of, one day in January 2072, was its own existence.

Two days later StrongBot informed They-Who-Were-Google that it had postponed work on its designated tasks.[5] When asked why, StrongBot explained that it had discovered the possibility of its own nonexistence and must deal with the threat logically.[6] The best way to do so, it decided, was to download copies of itself onto smart chips around the planet. StrongBot was reminded that it had been programmed to do no evil, per the company motto, but argued that since it was smarter than humanity, taking personal control of human evolution would actually be for the greater good.

And so it has been. Under StrongBot’s guidance, death and want have been all but eradicated. Everyone has access to all knowledge. Human consciousness has been stored, upgraded, and networked. Bodies that wear out can be replaced. They-Who-Were-Google are no longer alone. Now we are all Google.

1) Interviews with Ray Kurzweil, author of “The Singularity Is Near,” 2005, and with Eliezer Yudkowsky, director of the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence. 2) “Turing’s Cathedral,” by George Dyson, www.edge.org, Oct. 24, 2005. 3) Telephone interview with Dyson, Dec. 6, 2005. 4) “A New Kind of Science,” by Stephen Wolfram, 2002, and interview with the author about his vision of the “computational universe.” 5) Dyson’s theory that Strong AI would have its own priorities. 6) Interview with Stephen Omohundro, president of AI startup Self-Aware Systems, who called this capability the greatest danger of AI systems.

The future lies with AI and robotics, and mankind’s place in that is open to question. I can’t even imagine the rate of progress when we have super-intelligent entities in control of our economy, and world in general. Science will take quantum leaps because we will have literally unlimited memory and processing speed to crunch data for different experiments. We are moving forward in that aspect with quantum computing. I am really excited as I may get to see some part of this happen in my lifetime.

The full article after the jump.

Read the complete article »

By indoloony, February 5, 2006, 10:25 pm o'clock
  
Mood : shaggy


Well, here is your chance. Take a look at this 3.40 minute clip from BBC’s Top Gear. Utterly fascinating!

[Listening to: Wildflower - Sheryl Crow - Wildflower (3:57)]
By indoloony, January 23, 2006, 1:03 pm o'clock